Hacker News - Best

by Hacker News Community

Stop Doom Scrolling, Start Doom Coding: Build via the terminal from your phone

https://github.com/rberg27/doom-coding

By rbergamini27 ⬆️ 397 💬 267 [comments]

Top comment by purrcat259:

If you don't want to run your machine 24/7 (whether for electrical consumption, environmental, noise, etc reasons), I wrote an ssh proxy [1] that will send WOL packets to a target machine and hold your connection until its alive.

I then configured debian-autoshutdown [2] to turn the machine off if there's no traffic on ssh after 15 minutes.

This way I just ssh into my machine (whether via antigravity on my laptop or termius on my phone) and within 30 or so seconds its awake, no physical button presses needed. I documented the whole flow in more detail on my blog [3].

I'm now working on an improvement called machine on proxy (or mop) that will allow me to start Proxmox VMs instead of physical machines, so I can let gemini-cli run wild and if it decides to wipe the entire hard drive I can restore from a snapshot.

[1] https://github.com/simonamdev/ssh-wol-proxy

[2] https://github.com/mnul/debian-autoshutdown

[3] https://www.simonam.dev/ssh-wol-proxy/


Opus 4.5 is not the normal AI agent experience that I have had thus far

https://burkeholland.github.io/posts/opus-4-5-change-everything/

By tbassetto ⬆️ 502 💬 682 [comments]

Top comment by tripledry:

Putting the performance aside for now as I just started trying out Opus 4.5, can't say too much yet, I don't hype or hate AI as of now, it's simply useful.

Time will tell what happens, but if programming becomes "prompt engineering", I'm planning on quitting my job and pivoting to something else. It's nice to get stuff working fast, but AI just sucks the joy out of building for me.

Trying to not feel the pressure/anxiety from this, but every time a new model drops there is this tiny moment where I think "Is it actually different this time?"


Volkswagen Brings Back Physical Buttons

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a69916699/volkswagen-interior-physical-buttons-return/

By stephc_int13 ⬆️ 339 💬 31 [comments]

Top comment by ChrisArchitect:


Why is the Gmail app 700 MB?

https://akr.am/blog/posts/why-is-the-gmail-app-700-mb

By thefilmore ⬆️ 382 💬 341 [comments]

Top comment by crazygringo:

> For most of that period, the size of the Gmail app hovered around 12 MB, with a sudden jump to more than 200 MB near the start of 2017... The Gmail app, on the App Store, is currently 760.7 MB in size.

With charts:

https://www.axios.com/2017/12/15/the-top-iphone-apps-are-tak...

I had no idea common apps used to be just 10-30 MB. But are now hundreds of MB.

Something like Gmail doesn't have massive hi-resolution bitmap graphics. Since the article doesn't give any answer, I'm assuming it's a hand-wavy "frameworks", but that's an enormous amount of compiled code.


Vietnam bans unskippable ads

https://saigoneer.com/vietnam-news/28652-vienam-bans-unskippable-ads,-requires-skip-button-to-appear-after-5-seconds

By hoherd ⬆️ 1260 💬 658 [comments]

Top comment by jason_s:

I just uninstalled a game from my mobile phone this morning that had heavy ad usage. It was interesting to note the different ad display strategies. From least to most annoying:

- display a static ad, have the "x" to close appear soon (3-10 seconds)

- display an animated ad, have the "x" to close appear soon (3-10 seconds)

- display a static ad, have the "x" to close appear after 20-30 seconds

- display an animated ad, have the "x" to close appear after 20-30 seconds

- display several ads in succession, each short, but it automatically proceeds to the next; the net time after which the "x" to close appears after 20-30 seconds

- display several ads in succession, each lasts for 3-10 seconds but you have to click on an "x" to close each one before the next one appears

I live in the USA. The well-established consumer product brands (Clorox, McDonalds, etc.) almost all had short ads that were done in 3-5 seconds. The longest ads were for obscure games or websites, or for Temu, and they appeared over and over again, making me hate them with a flaming passion. The several-ads-in-succession were usually British newspaper websites (WHY???? I don't live there) or celebrity-interest websites (I have no interest in these).

It seems like the monkey's-paw curse for this kind of legislation is to show several ads in a row, each allowing you to skip them after 5 seconds.


65% of Hacker News posts have negative sentiment, and they outperform

https://philippdubach.com/standalone/hn-sentiment/

By 7777777phil ⬆️ 470 💬 436 [comments]

Top comment by ryukoposting:

OP's classifiers make two assumptions that I'd bet strongly influence the result:

1. Binning skepticism with negativity.

2. Not allowing for a "neutral" category.

The comment I'm writing right now is critical, but is it "negative?" I certainly don't mean it that way.

It's cool that OP made this thing. The data is nicely presented, and the conclusion is articulated cleanly, and that's precisely why I'm able to build a criticism of it!

And I'm now realizing that I don't normally feel the need to disclaim my criticism by complimenting the OP's quality work. Maybe I should do that more. Or, maybe my engagement with the material implies that I found it engaging. Hmm.